hopper, 1993 [2, abstract, overview, toc, switchboard, references]

2.4 Participants

Naturalistic inquiry emphasizes purposive rather than random sampling. By purposely selecting a wide range of subjects to observe, including different cases who are often missed by random sampling or rejected as "outliers" in quantitative research, the qualitative researcher is more likely to uncover the full array of "multiple realities" relevant to an inquiry (Lewin, 1935). A great deal can be learned by a careful study of the non typical subject. Questions such as "why does this subject respond differently, and what implications do these differences have in developing theory?" can be very productive in advancing scientific understanding (Lawler and Selfridge, 1991). For these reasons, participants in this research were carefully selected people associated with advanced educational computing initiatives or courseware development projects. In each organization, at least one participant was closely associated with the system hardware and software, while a second was more closely associated with selected courseware development projects. Finally, participants who were familiar with both were sought for their unique perspectives.
© Mary E. Hopper | MEHopper@TheWorld.com [posted 12/04/93 | revised 04/12/13]