A few days ago, Charles Kerr wrote of a Pratt and Whitney initiative tying
pay raises to completion of training and increased degree of
responsibility [surely a noble goal], and Roxanne Abbas agreed.
But a question to both, and to others: is the _quantity_ of completed
training (implied in Charles' post) an adequate measure of learning
outcomes? and if not, how do we assess those outcomes in a way that
allows us to link them with an increase in compensation?
-- -
Malcolm C. Burson<mooney@maine.maine.edu
Community Health and Counseling
Bangor, Maine
--"Malcolm Burson" <mooney@MAINE.MAINE.EDU>
Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>