R. Lucadello wrote:
> Anyway, now I am wondering if what we are dealing with in this
> "unlearning" thread is the results, often at the organizational level, of
> the "ladder of inference" developed by Chris Argyris and included in the
> Fifth Discipline Fieldbook.
It occured to me that in stead of "unlearning" we could use "double loop
learning". A classical, functional organisation is a "learning
organisation", as it was able to adapt itself to its environment/market,
but somehow was unable to learn learning. Nowadays it will require "double
loop learning" to stay in business: based on the "Model II theory in Use"
(Argyris "Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines"), we should be able to
counter-act, or Cre-Act (c) (not act, not re-act), the defensive reasoning
By the way, about the zen version of the mad tea party (the March Hare and
the Mad Hatter also shouted: "no room, no room"): should you add sugar
before or after pooring in the tea?
Drs J.C. Lelie CPIM email@example.com (J.C. Lelie) @date@ @time@ CREATECH/LOGISENS - Sparring Partner in Logistical Development - + (31) 70 3243475 Fax: idem or + (31) 40 2443225
Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <firstname.lastname@example.org> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>