The Converstion Here LO9104

I V N S Raju (IVNSR@anand.nddb.ernet.in)
Wed, 14 Aug 1996 17:15:08 +0530

Replying to LO9082 --

Replying to what Jyotsna wrote you said this:

> ... This group can and does serve as a means of
> dialogue about what works and doesn't work. It is an efficient means of
> scrutinizing the generalizations (hypotheses). In this process, we're
> generating the best approximation of truth. This, in my way of thinking,
> is a very powerful conversation. But then, of course, I am an N. ;)

What I liked most in your above message is your statement "we are
generating the best approximation of truth". This discussion group takes
up issues from quality to spirituality. What happens here is that the
members like me (and I suppose Jyotsna) would get caught in one of the
threads that talks about things that matter significantly while dealing
with current issues like (Resistance, Systems contribution to the change
efforts, role of people at the top etc.,). Discussions like this on
variety of subjects deprives the List of the Focus. The absence of Focus
is so conspicuous that members of the List make their presence on and off.
I have seen so many messages as evidence to this effect. So many members
did talk about their unsubscribing and subscribing. I personally feel
that the issue raised by Jyotsna is a matter of concern and needs our
Host's attention.

With Love
IVNS RAJU <IVNSR@ANAND.NDDB.ERNET.IN>

-- 

"I V N S Raju" <IVNSR@anand.nddb.ernet.in>

Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>