Ben Compton <BCOMPTON@novell.com> finishes up with:
>...Coming from a predominantly Christian community, I noticed that many
>people shy away from "ideas" that conflict with their religious beliefs
>and values. While I understand this attitude to some degree, I think in
>the long run it does them a great disservice. When our beliefs are never
>challenged, then they are far less integrated into our lives. If one
>accepts "Christian doctrine" as true and everlasting then certainly the
>ideas of men are not a threat, and can be valuable in exposing ideas that
>may just deepen one's theological knowledge.
While stationed with the forces in an isolated area, I cohabited the
officers' quarters with a priest and a minister. We had LOTS of time to
argue and discuss religion and philosophy. It was an early opportunity to
appreciate where people of significantly different backgrounds are coming
from and the WHYs of their beliefs. I learned that I could not judge
people by any mental model until I actually took time to know them and
their ideas. While I could go on about the details, suffice to say that
there are some systems thinkers among the clergy.
I agree with Ben that thinking does not threaten theology. What is a shame
is that all the storehouse of knowledge surrounding religion is not being
used to its full benefit. I am convinced that most of the content of
popular behavioural theory can also be found in the scriptures if one digs
deeply enough with an open mind! I would raise issues with these two
clergymen and they would each be able to point me to relevant material in
scripture or in theological references.
It is indeed unfortunate that the routine practicing of religion does not
afford people the same opportunity and insights...Keith
--Keith Cowan <72212.51@CompuServe.COM>
Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>