I agree your question is useful. Very useful to me. I am just trying to
understand exactly what you were asking...
I could have asked it better this way:
Are you saying that the L.O. community tends to think
that every successful organizational change effort must have a
"learning organization" or "learning disciplines" component?
>Again, I didn't say that it must be the case or that LO necessarily
>excluded the possibility. I did mean to imply that there is a
>strange case of insufficient matching between LO and extraordinary HR
>(or even learning) and asked for why this might be. I think my
>question is useful even if only marginally valid.
-- Art Kleiner, firstname.lastname@example.org