Responding to Mr Moreno
> computer based other than plain text files is probably not<
> simple enough to use and probably won't be used.<
and Ms Ogdin responses:
Would you both care to comment on the teaching and learning ability of
non-text or visual communication?
It is my understanding that a wide range of information is more easily
assimilated using pictorial or diagramatic means.
Is it true that the eye captures more data than the other senses?
Are we getting beyond the old audio-visual tutorial methods with the new
multimedia technologies?
Does the quality of graphic information have a great deal of effect on how
people respond?
How does the way something is designed have do with participation?
-- Mike Bloomenfeld MacBloom@aol.com