Mike, I think I follow your reasoning regarding motivation, but I'm
certain that I don't fully understand, since I see no basis in your
argument for the passion you exhibit. I'm not so sure your analysis works
if one makes a distinction between human development resulting from
biology and human development resulting from sociology. We often express
biological development as motivated (e.g., "survival of the species" or
"territorial imperative") although we may have a certain awareness that
such expressions are a form of anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism.
But, because we are aware of the power of inertia, we tend to associate
social action with motivation. Indeed, we spend an inordinate amount of
time and energy trying to "understand the motives" behind behavior. This
suggests to me a structure of belief which is very widespread and which
underlies a great deal of social change.
If I've completely missed the point, please help me understand. Concrete
examples would be especially helpful...
-- jack@his.com Tell me, what street compares with Mott Street in July? Jack Hirschfeld