Re: Metaphor and Mental Models

Jim Campbell (hum_mgr03@hg.uleth.ca)
Wed, 04 Jan 1995 09:32:41 MST

Tim's remarks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My original training was as a mathematician and physicist and, for a while,
I too subscribed to positivist or rationalist fantasies which would seek to
call truth or reality that which can be discerned by reason. I now take a
wider view and happen to think that all human communication is essentially
metaphoric in nature, including that which some would call objective reality.

In this light, I then happen to believe that using metaphors is not
something we do at times and not at others: we are continuously engaged in
using language as a metaphoric map for our experience whenever we
communicate with another.

Some maps are little better chosen and little more instructive in nature,
but in essence are no different from that which we do continuously.

Tim Dalmau Tel:61-1-874-8128 Fax:61-7-289-2131
Email:tim@well.sf.ca.us or tim@ozemail.com.au
PO Box 283 Samford Village Qld. 4520 Australia
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks Tim for some very insightful comments, good food for thought. I must
confess I was drifting and taking some shots at Charles's notes. Focusing after
the holiday this year seems to be tricky.

The concept of methaphorical maps(MM) needs more enchancement. There is a strong
consistency with perceptual and responsive mapping of thinking both for the
individual and in group settings. Mind Mapping as a technique has been used to
brainstorm ideas that surround a given issue but does not bring to light the
MM processes participating in the thinking process. Patterned mapping of
responsive systems speaks through all the layers of organized systems that we
are aware of. Order is inherent in all structures. MM offer a tantilizing
descriptor for understanding the ordering of language/thinking processes,
and to me (for Charles B) speaks to a need for mechanisms that will help with
the linking between MM that approach subjects for differential
perceptual(assumption) bases.

In organized human systems this concept could be key in prompting a new more
collaborative decision making that draws on the strenghts of participants
bringing their creativity into the process rather than using the expedient
forced choice method that have built many of our "Cat's Cradle" organizational
structures.

Thanks again Tim, what additional thoughts do you have on this issue!

We don't have time to do it right! We have time to do it over!

Jim Campbell Email: Campbell@HG.ULeth.CA
Phone: (403) 329-2753 Fax: (403) 329-2685
Training & Development, Human Resources
University of Lethbridge
4401 University Dr., Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1K 3M4

ENTP ----------------- Easy to get to know, Hard to understand!!!