From sj-approval  Sat May 27 07:40:51 1995
Return-Path: <sj-approval>
Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
	id AA10290; Sat, 27 May 1995 13:40:55 -0400
Received: from audumla.students.wisc.edu (students.wisc.edu) by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0)
	id AA10281; Sat, 27 May 1995 13:40:53 -0400
Received: from F182-035.net.wisc.edu by audumla.students.wisc.edu;
          id MAA30213; 8.6.9W/42; Sat, 27 May 1995 12:40:51 -0500
Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 12:40:51 -0500
Message-Id: <199505271740.MAA30213@audumla.students.wisc.edu>
X-Sender: jedelman@students.wisc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: sj@world.std.com
From: jedelman@students.wisc.edu (Josh Edelman)
Subject: Re: Hazelwood
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4>
Sender: sj-approval@world.std.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: sj

Jascha writes:
> But, what if a newspaper was produced as an
>extra-curricular activity?  Would they still be an "educational tool"?

"Extra-curricular," I believe, is still educational; students learn things 
from the debate team, I hope. But does a paper's identity as an "ed. tool" 
preclude it from being an "open forum?" Can one paper be both?

-Josh 


~~~~~~~~~~~~
Josh Edelman     jedelman@students.wisc.edu
"Lord, what fools these mortals be!"  -Shakespere
~~~~~~~~~~~~