From sj-approval Fri May 26 20:04:30 1995 Return-Path: Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA20733; Sat, 27 May 1995 00:04:31 -0400 Received: by world.std.com (5.65c/Spike-2.0) id AA20702; Sat, 27 May 1995 00:04:30 -0400 Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 00:04:30 -0400 From: joeshmoe (Jascha Franklin-Hodge) Message-Id: <199505270404.AA20702@world.std.com> To: sj@world.std.com Subject: Re: Hazelwood Sender: sj-approval@world.std.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: sj >The thing that intrigues me about Hazelwood is that it the whole thing >rests on a definition of school-funded newspapers as educational tools >and not "public forums." Does this mean that if a school-funded newspaper >accepts advertising or letters to the editor from the community it's a >public forum, and therefore exempt? Does anyone think that this might be >a basis for challenging Hazelwood? --David Courtland Well, the newspaper involved in Hazelwood was the product of a class (Journalism II). Therefore, I can see how they could justify it as an "educational tool." But, what if a newspaper was produced as an extra-curricular activity? Would they still be an "educational tool"? -Jascha