SUMMARY OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF RELIGION

(Here is a collection of important aspects of this book. There will be more than the four Sections shown here, when I am finished with this summary.)

Arlen Wolpert

System Dynamist and Independent Scholar

Draft of July 31,2009


Section 1: A practical application for the General Theory of Religion: Curing Mental Illness throughout the World by means of a Collaboration between Science and Religion.

Here is the outline of an open collaboration between System Dynamicists, who have been studying my system dynamics-based General Theory of Religion (GTR), and the talented and versatile scientists now working in the field of Genomics at The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard:

The highly regarded Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard is taking a position toward mental illness that I find complements the position taken by my General Theory of Religion (GTR). There may be a way to integrate these two approaches through an open collaboration:
  1. The Broad Institute believes the application of the most advanced genomic tools will solve the problem of what is causing mental illnesses, like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression. Once the genomic cause is known for each illness, the Broad Institute believes conceiving and developing novel, more effective treatments for such illnesses can finally be accomplished. The Broad Institute is now involved in a 10 year, $500 million project along these lines.
  2. The GTR's scientific position is that most mental illnesses begin their development at the moment when the abreaction or release of a trauma has led to panic and a nervous breakdown. When the panic and nervous breakdown occur the abreaction process or the release of the trauma ceases, usually during the unsuccessful releasing process of the first set of cramped, antagonistic heart muscles. However - and this is very important - if there is no panic and nervous breakdown during the abreaction of the trauma, the entire release of the trauma will be successfully completed and mental illness will not develop. The GTR's position is that the primary purpose of a religion is to religiously prepare children of that particular religion, in case those children are traumatized in the future. Specifically, the GTR's position is that the aim of a religion is to prepare those children so they will be able to deal with the beginning signs of panic that will be present when the trauma is eventually beginning to be released. In short, the primary purpose of a religion is to avoid the panic and the nervous breakdown, associated with the eventual release or abreaction of a trauma. If the children's religious preparedness has been done effectively, no panic and nervous breakdown will occur. As a result, there will be no mental illness among the devotees of that religion. Therefore, if a study of a person's genomics shows a tendency toward - for example - schizophrenia, this form of mental illness will only begin to develop in that person after panic and a nervous breakdown occurs. Note carefully: the GTR's position is that a religiously prepared child will eventually be prepared to deal with the release of a trauma later in his or her life: He or she will be able to keep the panic and nervous breakdown from occurring. This has been carefully described in Key #1 of the Introduction to the GTR, where I reveal how I was able to avoid panic and a nervous breakdown at the age of 30 during the abreaction or release of my childhood trauma. That childhood trauma occurred when I was a child of 9 or 10 years old. I was religiously prepared, mainly by my mother and father and by Sunday school. The critical years were between the ages of about 1 through 15 years old.Therefore, I believe a careful study of religious preparedness is the most important and the most central phenomenon for scientists and religious leaders to study. Collaborating scientists conducting such a study might include some of the talented and versatile scientists at the Broad Institute and some system dynamicists who are now studying and becoming interested in my internet presentation of my General Theory of Religion analysis. The main idea here is that if the panic and nervous breakdown do occur during the abreaction, then - and only then - will the results of the Broad Institute's genomics approach - described above - come into play. Here is another important point: the GTR is finding that the primary purpose of a religion is very similar for most of the religions existing throughout the world (see Key #2 and Key #3 just below). Therefore, the results of the collaboration between system dynamicists, who are studying, analyzing, and publishing about a great variety of complex systems, and the versatile scientists at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, who are focused on the use of Genomics to cure mental illness, could begin a very interesting long term project: A project that may eventually wipe out mental illness throughout the world, but only in conjunction with local religions throughout the world.
We are asking the Broad Institute to consider making the integration of these two approaches to the origin and cure of most mental illnesses the centerpiece of their very important 10 year, $500 million project. Success on such an open collaboration between those scientists working with the genomics approach, those working with the religious approach, and those working with the psychiatric approach could not only bring about the elimination of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, but could also bring about deep cultural integration and cultural teamwork between genomics, religion, psychiatry, and the pharmaceutical industry. Such integration and teamwork will always be desperately needed in a modern culture.

In the modern era, it is so critical that leaders of the government, the industrial community, the business community, the scientific community, the pharmaceutical industry, the universities, the psychiatric community, and the religious communities learn to work together. I believe such cultural teamwork would bring about healthy, vibrant societies throughout the world: Societies as free as possible from those mental illnesses that result from the panic and nervous breakdown associated with the release or abreaction of a trauma.


Key #2: A Brief Introduction to the General Theory of Religion.

"... if there is ever to be a universal religion, it must be one which will have no location in place or time; which will be infinite like the God it will preach, and whose sun will shine upon the followers of Krishna and of Christ, on saints and sinners alike; which will not be Brahminic or Buddhistic, Christian or Mohammedan, but the sum total of all these, and still have infinite space for development..." (Vivekananda 1893)

Table I, below, gives the 14 stages of my 53 month religious crisis. The details of Table I give the reader a brief and concise base for understanding the similarities of religions and for understanding the deep concept of a general theory of religion.

Please notice that Purgation is listed at Stage 11 and Mystical Union is listed at Stage 12 of the Judeo-Christian terminology. The Hindu terminology uses the term Overcoming Samskaras for the experience of Purgation and uses the term Samadhi for the experience of Mystical Union, etc.


Key #3: Why a Culture Cannot Survive without Religion.

(Why has religious belief survived throughout the whole history of mankind?)

Here are some of the most important religious insights of the book: They are based on my very detailed scientific, presuppositionless, System Dynamics(SD)-based Transcendental Feedback Phenomenological (TFP) analysis of my religious experience, particularly the finer and finer simulations of my core consciousness during purgation. This analysis is being carried out in detail in Chapters 5 and 6. The finer and finer simulations have slowly uncovered the practical reason why prayer, imagination, and religious belief have survived from the time of migrating primitive tribes to the present:

Section 2: How I have used the Transcendental Feedback Phenomenology (TFP) methodology to solve or realize Husserl's quest for a scientifically rigorous psychology and a scientifically rigorous psychiatry. My illustrative example is focused on the release or abreaction of my childhood trauma and its relationship to my religious experience of purgation culminating in mystical union.

A brief presentation of my TFP analysis of core consciousness during my experience of purgation

A subjective or deep inner experience began to present itself to me at about noon on April 8,1962, nineteen days after my 30th birthday: I was walking down a hill with a small suitcase in my hand. As I walked reflectively and in peace down that hill in the warm and brilliant Southern California sun, my heart slowly began to feel full. My mind was drawn inward. This was the very beginning of my ten hour religious experience of purgation, which culminated in the great, 4 to 7 second, experience of mystical union. During those beginning moments I was baffled: I thought, "Where is this experience within me coming from?" Right there was the key problem: Where does this experience originate? In science this problem - associated with the onset and the continuation to the end of subjective or deep inner experiences - is an example of what is now being called Chalmers Hard Problem (CHP). The four paragraphs below answer the first of the following three questions:
  1. Where did the ten hour religious experience of purgation originate?
  2. Under what conditions did my subjective or deep inner experience become labeled as a ten hour religious experience of purgation?
  3. How was it possible for my religious experience of purgation to proceed all the way to its ten-hour completion and then culminate in the great experience of mystical union - despite purgation's intense PsychicStress, Fear, and Anxiety?
Solving Chalmers Hard Problem (CHP) for the case of purgation aims at identifying the origins or material forces within me, driving purgation's core consciousness phenomena during that experience. My system dynamics analysis of my core consciousness phenomena during purgation found that the dynamic material forces driving my dynamic core consciousness during purgation were the spontaneous releasing - one by one - of about 12 pairs of cramped or paralyzed, antagonistic, muscles in my heart. Those pairs of heart muscles had become cramped or paralyzed during my childhood trauma, way back when I was 9 or 10 years old. Then, 20 or 21 years later - at the age of 30 - my trauma and its associated cramped or paralyzed heart muscles had become ripe for release. Finally, the abreaction or spontaneous release of those heart muscles began.

However, it is very important to be aware that during the releasing process of a trauma the trauma's associated psychic stress, fear, and anxiety are usually too much to bear for the experiencer. He or she usually panics, has a nervous breakdown, and then develops some sort of mental illness. Therefore, in order for the experiencer to be able to deal with that psychic stress, fear, and anxiety associated with the release of a trauma, the experiencer must use prayer, religious preparedness, etc. Such activity is the Primary Purpose of Religion. That is, my blessed prayers and religious preparedness enabled me to bear the anxiety, fear, and psychic stress without panicking, having a nervous breakdown, etc. This allowed me to go through the emotional crisis and arrive at a complete abreaction or release of my trauma. Because I used prayers, etc, throughout the ten-hour release of my trauma and because the experience was rooted deeply in my heart, my spontaneous religious response has dominated my memory of the abreaction or release of my trauma.

In my particular case, my cramped or paralyzed heart muscles spontaneously went through the process of releasing themselves. The dynamics of my releasing heart muscles drove the dynamic data of my core consciousness phenomena. That dynamic data of core consciousness was then immediately and permanently stored in my long term memory (LTM) at the time of that abreaction or release. The data of core consciousness being stored in my LTM was about the dynamics of my core consciousness during the entire ten hour purgation experience, including the core consciousness data about the state of openness of my heart. (Please note: Because my cramped or paralyzed heart muscles were spontaneously releasing themselves one by one, it naturally caused the state of my cramped up heart to begin to return to its full or open or natural position: Therefore, my heart was opening.)

Twenty two years later, in 1984 when I was 52 years old, I began the system dynamics-based analysis. The first thing I delved into was the dynamic core consciousness data for my ten hour experience of purgation. Immanuel Kant would have called that dynamic core consciousness data, associated with purgation and stored in my LTM, the dynamic phenomena of purgation. Also, he would have called the estimated 12 pairs of cramped or paralyzed, antagonistic muscles in my heart, that were - one by one - being spontaneously abreacted or released, the dynamic noumena.

I will now present how I was able to get the answer to question #1:

Getting the answer to Question #1: Identifying the dynamic noumena or the dynamic physical objects or the origin of the purgation experience.
(This also happens to be the scientific solution to Chalmers' hard problem [CHP] for the case of my deep ten-hour religious experience of purgation.)

My analysis leading up to identifying the noumena has been focused on analyzing the core consciousness data of the phenomena stored in my LTM, because I am proceeding according to Newton's Rules of Philosophizing rather than Descartes' Discourse on Method. Proceeding according to Newton's method, which is now called the scientific method, eventually resulted in the transcendental grounding (Natorp/Kim 2003) of core consciousness during the deep inner experience of purgation. The aim of the task of transcendentally grounding purgation is to identify the dynamic physical objects or noumena in my neurophysiological system that were driving the phenomena: These phenomena were associated with my core consciousness during my entire experience of purgation.

Though Kant (1724-1804), Franz Brentano (1838-1917), Paul Natorp (1854-1924), the Marburg School of Neokantianism (1870-1920), Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), Ernst Cassirer (1874-1945), Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973), and others (see Holzhey 2005) studied such phenomena deeply, they were unable to transcendentally ground phenomena in a scientific way, because science was not advanced enough in the 18th, 19th, and the first half of the 20th century. The solving of CHP could only have been attained after the first half of the 20th century, because it was only after World War II that the two critical breakthroughs in science, required for solving CHP, occurred:

  1. The publication of the powerful System Dynamics (SD) methodology (Forrester 1961, 1968b).
  2. The invention of computers for implementing the SD methodology, particularly implementing the solution to sets of simultaneous nonlinear differential equations.

SD is the underlying analytical tool of the three step Transcendental Feedback Phenomenological (TFP) methodology (For a short introduction to these three steps see the next paragraph. Later, you can also study Chapter 5 or Section I in Chapter 6.) Using the three steps of the SD-based TFP methodology, I am able to mathematically analyze my first person core consciousness data residing in my LTM. In that analysis, shown in Section II in Chapter 6, the SD-based TFP methodology scientifically structures the data for purgation in a very compatible way: As a multiloop nonlinear feedback system (MNFS). The reason the TFP methodology is compatible with biological phenomena is because the MNFS structure is the same structure as the entire neurophysiological system. The neurophysiological system underlies and drives core consciousness.

Here is a short introduction to the three steps of the SD-based TFP methodology. The methodology is illustrated by showing how it is used for analyzing core consciousness during purgation:

My analysis of core consciousness during purgation began in 1984 and has continued steadily right up to the present time. The key breakthrough was Step III, above. It occurred in 2007. The list of nine items below gives the sequence of scientific tasks I have been performing since 1984, together with the collection of observations and insights that I became aware of during that analytical period. Basically, I used Steps I, II, and III of the SD-based TFP methodology to analyze the core consciousness data in my LTM. Please note that all the core consciousness data for purgation, residing in my LTM, is associated with or driven by the dynamic noumena. That core consciousness data was dynamic. It varied - moment by moment - during my ten hour experience of purgation.

In summary, here is how this SD-based TFP methodology was used to solve CHP for the case of core consciousness during purgation: I first focused on my core consciousness data, associated with my deep ten hour religious experience of purgation. It resided in my LTM. I then use Steps I and II of the TFP methodology to analyze that data. (For details of this formalized analysis and construction of the purgation feedback system, see Section I and Section II of Chapter 6. The results of this scientific task are summarized in item 1 of the nine item list below. Then, by focusing on Step III, I obtained the results summarized in items 2 thru 9 of the list below. In those items my SD-based TFP analysis of core consciousness during my experience of purgation identifies the probable dynamic physical objects or transcendental objects or noumena that are the origins or driving forces of my core consciousness during purgation. This comprehensive analysis of purgation illustrates how the SD-based TFP methodology was able to solve CHP for my deep inner experience of purgation.

  1. In Steps I and II the SD-based TFP methodology was used to construct the 38 variable SD flow diagram and its associated mathematical model. This construction used the core consciousness data collected in my LTM during my experience of purgation (see Figure 2 and its derivation in Sections I and II of Chapter 6). The flow diagram in Figure 2 was completed in 1994.
  2. Then, in 2007 I began to use perhaps the most critical and most important step, Step III. First the Step III technique found that the flow diagram for core consciousness during purgation, developed in item 1 above and shown in Figure 2, is a second-order negative feedback system (SONFS). Once the order of the flow diagram or feedback system is identified, the dynamic characteristic of the noumena is also identified.
  3. Then, to determine the noumena driving the phenomena, I needed to search through all the dynamic physical objects within my neurophysiological system and find those dynamic objects that operate as a SONFS. At this particular early period in my search I have found only one promising candidate: Any set of dynamic antagonistic muscles operates as a SONFS.
  4. During my 10 hour experience of purgation I sensed or observed that the dynamics of purgation was being experienced mainly in my heart. Therefore, if the promising candidate is antagonistic muscles, they must be heart muscles.
  5. The great stress, fear, and anxiety - accompanying the releasing process of each set of antagonistic heart muscles - indicated that those muscles had been cramped or paralyzed prior to the estimated 72 minute period when the spontaneous releasing of the cramped or paralyzed heart muscles occurred. That estimated 72 minute period occurred between the estimated 545 minute mark and the estimated 617 minute mark (see Figure 1 in Section II.B of Chapter 6).
  6. During the Step II analysis (which is located just after the Introduction in Section II of Chapter 6), I sensed or estimated that there were about a dozen or so pairs of cramped antagonistic heart muscles released during purgation.
  7. Therefore, the dynamic noumena - that drove my dynamic core consciousness phenomena during purgation as a SONFS - was probably releasing a dozen or so pairs of cramped or paralyzed, antagonistic, heart muscles over an estimated 72 minute period.
  8. I then asked myself what had caused the cramping or paralyzation in my heart muscles. I then remembered I had a childhood trauma when I was 9 or 10 years old: The trauma had probably caused the cramping or paralyzation.
  9. Therefore, the origin or driving force of the purgation experience was probably the abreaction or release of the effects of my childhood trauma.
I believe this is the probable solution to Chalmers' Hard Problem (CHP) for the case of my deep religious experience of purgation. It tells of the origin of my ten hour experience of purgation. It answers the first of the three questions.
(See the summary at the beginning of Chapter 6. It gives the answers to the second and third questions.)

Additional information associated with the above summary of my solution to CHP for the case of purgation:

The above brief summary illustrates how Chalmers' Hard Problem (CHP) is solved for deep inner experiences, like purgation. It also illustrates how the mind/body problem is solved. Even though these solutions are very insightful - particularly for scientifically oriented philosophers, psychiatrists, and religious people - high level scientists will probably not be satisfied with this kind of solution. For example, for such scientists the solution to CHP is only the first breakthrough. Granted, this first breakthrough - the solution to CHP - is the key to any thorough extended analysis. Nevertheless, neuroscientists and cardiovascular experts - working together - will wish to perform three additional analytical steps to finalize the analysis for the case of purgation. I cannot perform those three analytical steps, because I am not skilled enough in neuroscience and cardiovascular science. (I am a theoretical mechanical engineer and system dynamicist.) The three additional analyses required are:
  1. Determining the precise location in my heart of the cramped, antagonistic heart muscles. This is a very difficult "easy problem" (see Chalmers' statement about the easy problems of consciousness at the end of the summary in Chapter 6).
  2. Determining the neurobiological correlates of consciousness (NCC) during purgation. This is also a very difficult "easy problem." (see the statements on CHP by Crick, Koch, and Searle at the end of this summary). These difficult "easy problems" are available for analysis only after the CHP breakthrough for purgation has been precisely solved (see item 1 just above). Once item 1 has been solved, the neuroscientists and cardiovascular experts need to neurophysiologically link the dynamic sets of cramped, antagonistic heart muscles with the dynamic core consciousness going on during the experience of purgation. (My early conjecture is that the key to this linkage is understanding the operation of the experiencer's somatosensory system. It looks to me like that system extends all the way from (1)the cramped heart muscles that are being released to (2)the postcentral gyrus in the experiencer's cerebral cortex. The location of the latter part of the somatosensory system is probably where the dynamic core consciousness associated with purgation had been generated during the release of my trauma.)
  3. The method for testing the scientific validity of my SD-based, FP analysis of purgation is shown in Chapter 6, Section II.B, item 11.

Section 3: Comparison of the two competing analytical methodologies being used in the field of Phenomenology: Method I is my Transcendental Feedback Phenomenology (TFP) methodology, developed between 1984 and 2008. Method II is Edmund Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology (TP) methodology, developed between 1901 and 1938.
(Draft of January 16,2009)

Method I: This is my three-step, system dynamics(SD)-based, Transcendental Feedback Phenomenology (TFP) methodology. It was developed during a 24 year period from 1984 to 2008. How to use TFP is made clear by an illustrative example presented in this book: That example is the TFP analysis of my deep, subjective, ten hour, religious experience of purgation.
  1. Introduction to Method I:

    During the 24 years from 1984 to 2008 I have been absorbed in the following project: Developing the TFP methodology, while at the same time using TFP to deeply understand my dynamic, deep, ten hour, subjective, religious experience of purgation.
    (Purgation culminates in the great, 4 to 7 second, experience of mystical union. However, in this book my experience during mystical union will not be part of the illustrative example. By the way, I am calling this classical, two stage, dynamic, religious experience: PMU.)

    After the religious experience of purgation occurred in April 1962, the data for the dynamic core consciousness system associated with purgation has been residing permanently in my long term memory (LTM). That is the data that I am using, as I apply the Transcendental Feedback Phenomenological (TFP) methodology to scientifically analyzed the dynamics of my core consciousness system associated with my ten hour religious experience of purgation. That dynamic religious experience of purgation occurred spontaneously when I was 30 years old.

    TFP uses the system dynamics (SD) methodology (Forrester 1961) to formally and mathematically and scientifically analyze my core consciousness system, which is also called my phenomena system.

    Here is a brief summary of the strategy of my TFP methodology, as it goes about analyzing the dynamics of my core consciousness system, permanently residing in my long term memory (LTM). Please keep in mind that the data for the dynamics of my core consciousness system during purgation occurred in April 1962. At that time the data began to permanently reside in my LTM. Then, my TFP analysis of that data occurred during the analytical period between 1984 and 1994.

  2. Here is a more detailed presentation on how this project goal was accomplished: First, I used the unformalized Step I, the SD-based causal loop diagram technique, to begin exploring the dynamic core consciousness data in my LTM. After becoming familiar with the data, using Step I, I then used the formalized Step II, the basic SD technique itself, to mathematically model or structure core consciousness during purgation. Step II structured purgation's core consciousness system as a multiloop nonlinear feedback system. This structure has the same form as the standard structure of the entire neurophysiological system. The resulting mathematical model and its structure then enabled me to simulate my core consciousness system during purgation. These simulations describe my experience of purgation. The model of my core consciousness system during purgation is called the phenomena for the experience of purgation. Then, I began using Step III of the TFP methodology: With it I performed the eidetic reduction according to the TFP methodology. I transcendentally grounded the dynamic core consciousness system or dynamic phenomena in my noumena. The noumena is the name for the set of dynamic physical objects, located in my neurophysiological system, that were driving the dynamic core consciousness or the dynamic phenomena. (see Forrester 1968b) The Step III analysis found that my dynamic experience of purgation originated from or was grounded in the spontaneous release of about a dozen sets of cramped antagonistic heart muscles.
  3. The three-steps of the TFP methodology are roughly the same as the steps used in Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenological (TP) methodology, developed between 1901 and 1938. However, I am finding that Steps II and III of the TFP methodology gives TFP a much more subtle mathematical formalization and, as a result, gives the TFP methodology the power to scientifically determine the dynamic physical noumena that was driving the dynamic phenomena or core consciousness during my experience of purgation. In order to accomplish such an analysis, the TFP methodology goes far beyond Husserl's TP methodology. Among other subtle techniques associated with the TFP methodology, TFP incorporates feedback system techniques and incorporates the use of a computer, capable of solving sets of simultaneous nonlinear differential equations.
  4. Summarizing: The first two steps of the TFP methodology enabled me to model and simulate the dynamic core consciousness data or phenomena data during my experience of purgation, moment by moment, over its ten hour length. The key to this kind of analysis is the data for my experience of purgation was permanently stored in my LTM and, as a result, was always available to me. These moment by moment simulations were able to describe the dynamics of core consciousness during my religious experience of purgation. Then, Step III of the TFP methodology performed the eidetic reduction according to the TFP methodology: I transcendentally grounded the model of my religious experience by locating purgation's origin in my neurophysiological system: Specifically, I found that the dynamic phenomena, which is the dynamic core consciousness data during purgation, was driven by the release or abreaction of about a dozen sets of cramped antagonistic heart muscles. Those sets of heart muscles had become cramped during my childhood trauma when I was 9 or 10 years old. During the 20 or 21 years between the childhood trauma and the release of the trauma at 30 years of age, my trauma was becoming ripe for release until it made its spontaneous release at 30.
Method II: This is Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology (TP) methodology, developed during the 37 years between 1901 and 1938. As was stated in paragraph #3 above, TP does not use the scientific method. In addition, the TP methodology has not been made clear by a presentation of an illustrative example, showing how the TP methodology is used. However, I believe that Method I, which is my three-Step FP methodology, is actually the realization of Husserl's scientific aim for the TP methodology. This scientific aim of Husserl began in 1911 and lasted until his death in 1938. Husserl called that scientific aim, Philosophy as a Rigorous Science (Husserl 1911). To clarify how the three steps of my Method I can be used to realize Husserl's scientific aim for his TP methodology, please study the rest of this Summary Item #1, shown below:
  1. First, we need to identify Husserl's best English presentation of his TP methodology. It is generally accepted that Husserl best presentation in English was meant for the Fourteenth Edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica. However, it was generally thought that Salmon, the man who made the original translation from German to English, did not do a good job. The leaders of the Phenomenology community in the English speaking world decided to correct this situation. A new translator was hired and a revised translation was made. This new translator was Richard E. Palmer. Palmer's translation was accepted by those leaders. The resulting publications, associated with Palmer's revised translation, can be found at the following two links: Husserl 1971 or McCormick 1981. At the present time I am going to present here only the first paragraph of Palmers revised translation of Husserl's single paragraph Introduction to his TP methodology: It is shown below in quotation marks.
  2. Now, I will begin to explain how my three-step, TFP methodology fits into Husserl's scientific aim for his Transcendental Phenomenological (TP) methodology. I have placed three footnote numbers in Husserl's first paragraph. That first paragraph gives Husserl's Introduction to his presentation. It is shown below in quotation marks. These three numbers will then lead the reader to my three footnotes. I believe the reader will find from those footnotes that Husserl's methodology needs to be more scientific. Because of the lack of scientific formalization in his Transcendental Phenomenology (TP) methodology, Husserl tried until the end of his life in 1938 to scientifically develop his TP methodology. However, even though Husserl was an outstanding mathematician, he did not succeed. The reason he did not succeed was (1) Forrester's system dynamics (SD) methodology had not been developed and published until 1961 and (2) computers for solving sets of simultaneous nonlinear differential equation had not been developed until World War II, or shortly thereafter.
  3. Here is Palmer's revised translation of the single paragraph Introduction to Husserl's genuine summary of his TP methodology. It is followed by my footnotes:
  4. Here is Salmon's single paragraph Introduction to Husserl's TP methodology: It is very misleading:
    "Phenomenology denotes a new, descriptive, philosophical method, which, since the concluding years of the last century, has established (1) an a priori psychological discipline, able to provide the only secure basis on which a strong empirical psychology can be built, and (2) a universal philosophy, which can supply an organum for the methodical revision of all the sciences."
In summary, I recommend that Method I, Transcendental Feedback Phenomenology (TFP), should be established as the standard methodology in the field of Phenomenology, because my TFP is able to obtain a much more scientifically rigorous empirical psychology. This is leading to a scientific-based psychology or psychiatry. Ultimately, I believe TFP is leading the way to Husserl's long term aim: Philosophy as a Rigorous Science (PRS).

The reason Husserl's TP methodology is now somewhat obsolete is as follows:

  1. Forrester's system dynamics (SD) methodology had not been developed and published until 1961. Husserl died in 1938.
  2. Computers for solving sets of simultaneous nonlinear differential equation had not been developed until World War II, or shortly thereafter.
Brilliant as Husserl was in philosophy and mathematics, his technical or analytical work is mired in the state of scientific knowledge existing in the first half of the 20th century.

Section 4: The two paths taken by my mind in dealing with my religious experience: Doxa and Episteme.

Here is a brief introduction to these two important concepts: Doxa and Episteme.
  1. When I began experiencing the release of my trauma at 30 years of age, my focus was on avoiding panic and a nervous breakdown. By trying to avoid panic and a nervous breakdown during the release of my trauma, I was engaged with the Primary Purpose of Religion. For this task religion uses doxa. Doxa, in this case, is an imaginative method that is sometimes used successfully to deal with a deep threat to one's life. In my case doxa was focused on my fear, stress, and anxiety associated with the release of my cramped heart muscles during the abreaction or release of my childhood trauma.
  2. Later, when I began to work toward scientifically establishing the General Theory of Religion at the age of 52, I began using episteme. Episteme, in this case, is the use of a formalized scientific method to obtain the scientific truth about my religious experience.
What I have found from my religious experience is that without using religious doxa I could not have avoided panic and a nervous breakdown during the release of my trauma. I could not have walked the plank. As a result I could not have experienced purgation and mystical union. Without the data of purgation in my long term memory (LTM), I could not have used episteme to develop the General Theory of Religion (GTR).

I know that without using doxa I could not have walked the plank. By not using doxa, I would have panicked, had a nervous breakdown, and ended up with some form of psychosis. In addition, I could not have experienced purgation culminating in mystical union (PMU) and therefore could not have had the data for PMU in my LTM. As a result, I could not have used episteme to develop the GTR.

It is important that scientists and intellectuals, particularly those interested in the field of mental illness, humble themselves a bit when dealing with the concept of doxa: During the release or abreaction of a trauma; or during wartime battle in defense of one's country; or during great stress, fear, and anxiety: doxa is a very important player in the Primary Purpose of Religion.


Path I: The Path of Religious Doxa:

In order to comprehend religious doxa, I need to tell you about the most important 3 or 4 minutes of my life. During those 3 or 4 minutes the first of about 12 sets of cramped antagonistic heart muscles was being released. During those 3 or 4 minutes I had to 'walk the plank.' Once you understand how a religiously prepared person is able to successfully 'walk the plank,' you will begin to understand doxa and the primary purpose of religion.
Yea,
Though I walk through the valley
Of the shadow of death
I will fear no evil:
For thou art with me;

from Psalm 23 of the Bible or the Old Testament


Path II: The Religious Path of Episteme:

At the foundation of religion is the religious experience of purgation culminating in mystical union (PMU). Though PMU is thought to be a rare experience, I don't believe it is as rare as most people think. I believe most of those who experience it keep it to themselves. PMU is central to all cultures. For example, each culture has a name for mystical union. That name usually comes down from the Ages: satori, no-thing, wu-wei, enlightenment, nirvakalpa samadhi, fana, devekut, ecstasy, born again, etc. (see stage 12 of Table I, a few pages below). During mystical union one experiences the fundamental note of one's existence or the sacred ground of one's being. Of those people who have experienced mystical union, some have been more successful than others in the important task of integrating that experience into their way of life and their philosophy and presenting and interpreting its greatness to their culture.

This book presents yet another approach to interpreting that great experience: The approach of Episteme. For the first time, ever - the approach is a formalized, presuppositionless, scientific approach: It uses the powerful Forrester-style system dynamics (SD) methodology to model, simulate, and transcendentally ground the data of my core consciousness during purgation. This data has been located or stored in my long term memory (LTM), ever since 1962.

The SD analytical methodology can be applied to analyze and comprehend almost any kind of system, but when the analyst applies SD to scientifically model, simulate, and transcendentally ground his own dynamic core consciousness system that was operating during a deep experience, such as his core consciousness system operating during his 1962 religious experience of purgation, the analyst is using a very complex, subtle, and unique kind of application of the SD analytical methodology. As a result, I have given a special name for that kind of application of the SD analytical methodology: I call it Transcendental Feedback Phenomenology (TFP).

Return to homepage.