Poster presentation at the Conference: Toward a Science of Consciousness, 'Tucson II', April 8-13, 1996.

(The paper that follows is a 1998 revision of the paper handed out at that 1996 presentation. However, my work has advanced considerably since this 1998 revision. My web homepage gives a summary of my most recent insights, including insights on mental imagery, how to mathematically model mental imagery, and insights on the neural correlates of consciousness.)


Title: Toward an understanding of the mind by using cybernetics to analyze an experience of the Dark Night of the Soul.

Santayana on the controversy between the scientist and the mystic:

'It is easy, from the stand-point of acquired practical
competence, to deride a merely imaginative life. Dirision,
however, is not interpretation, and the better method of
overcoming erratic ideas is to trace them out dialectically
and see if they will not recognize their own fatuity. ...
Otherwise we might kill the goose that lays the golden
egg, and by proscribing imagination abolish science.'(20)

A. Introduction

Mystical union is central to cultures. It is called variously: enlightenment, samadhi, devekut, fana, born again, satori, wu-wei, etc. In 1962 I had an experience of the Dark Night of the Soul or Purgation. This experience immediately preceeded mystical union. To determine whether or not there was any reality to this experience, I will proceed along the lines suggested by Santayana above by making a cybernetic analysis of the experience of the Dark Night. The cybernetic dialectic is the Forrester-style system dynamics method of reasoning(1).

The experience of the Dark Night is drawn out of shallow unconscious, recursively or iteratively. The steps used in this recursion are:

  1. The causal loop diagram concept from system dynamics.
  2. Narrative or journal writing (see Reference 2).
  3. Flow diagram (see Figure 1).
  4. Mathematical model (see Figure 2).
  5. Simulation (see Figures 3 and 4).
  6. Enrich the model by organizing around it vast amounts of relevant information from religion, philosophy, and science.
  7. Searle's theory of intentionality (see Reference 10).
  8. Identification of the neural correlates of consciousness.
This paper is an interim report at the eleven-year mark of this unending recursive recall and analysis. (See item 1 of the Appendix for corroboration from Tucson II plenum speaker's abstracts of this 1st person to 3rd person approach.)

The recall produces apperceptions which are later examinations of, and reflections on, the cognitions, perceptions, and intentionality accumulated in memory during the experience. The system dynamics analysis organizes these apperceptions to form Figures 1 and 2: the multiloop, nonlinear, feedback system dynamics flow diagram and its mathematical model.

The results of this recursive method, contrary to the fatuity that Santayana might expect, are as follows:

The most controversial step of the dialectic is Forrester's 5th principle of system dynamics: "Quantification of unmeasured but important concepts and relationships." (See item 2 of the Appendix for elaboration.)

B. The Crisis.

During 1958 to 1962 when I was going through a crisis in my life and, in addition, working under stress, I went through a series of stages of mind and heart, eventually culminating in mystical union (2). Starting with a tragic event that led to depression and disintegration of moral character - the bifurcation sequence in order of appearance included renunciation, spiritual fire, concentration, absorption or flow(3), Dark Night of the Soul, and mystical union. After that I was in a divine state called bhava(4) for three months and then slowly descended back to a more normal state. Table I on the next page lists the sequence of stages. The cybernetic analysis that follows focuses on stage 11. Table I indicates the analysis is leading to a general theory of religion.

C. Cybernetic analysis, leading to a system dynamics model/simulation of Stage 11.

Surprisingly, modeling and simulating stage 11 is easier than for more mundane human experience: Simon and Kaplan(5) stated, 'Deep thinking has proved easier to understand and simulate than hand-eye coordination' (because it goes on) 'inside the human head without interaction with the environment.' But what is my purpose in modeling and simulating stage11? First and foremost, it organizes such an abstract experience into a relatively simple structure. Once this structure is grasped many sacred insights reported from religious experiences throughout the world can be related to it meaningfully. In addition a spiraling escalation in understanding occurs: As one meditates on this structure, understanding deepens, leading to further refinement and development of the structure. Secondly, it shows how I have been doing meditation or psychoanalysis of myself since 1985 by using system dynamics to awaken the memory of this deep experience, repressed in shallow unconscious episodic memory for 23 years (from 1962 to 1985). Thirdly, it indicates the presence of feedback in human cognition, thought and experience. Fourthly, it leads to a relatively detailed description of what one particular mystic experienced during a ten hour period of the Dark Night by means of an hour-by-hour, a minute-by-minute, and, in the 3rd knot analysis in item 5 below, a very personal second-by second analysis. Fifthly, it reveals the unconscious intentionality that drives all living things.

D. The Unconscious.

The central paradox of mystical union is that the mystic is driven to search for and find the Ultimate which his conscious mind never knew existed (see Table I). It is like the creative scientist who senses and then attains hidden truth. For the mystic, though, it is like the hero's Quest for the Holy Grail: the essence of Myth. We now examine this paradox by analyzing the model of the Dark Night, using Searle's Theory of Intentionality to indicate that in mystical union there is a conscious realization of an unconscious Intentional mental state accompanied by intense cathexis.

The flow diagram of the Dark Night shown in Figure 1 gathers together in one system important mental states or capabilities associated with the Dark Night. Searle (10) would call this system, 'A Network of Intentional states permeated with a Background of capacities'. These elements can be organized into the following eight sets, in the order in which they occur in the experience:

Because of the abbreviated nature of this paper, I will only analyze the Network of Intentionality in sets 3 and 6 here.

Set #3: The Intentionality analysis of set#3 is summarized in Table II. Set 3 is dominated by conscious prayer, an unconscious opening to freedom driven by a life force, and by an unconscious love also driven by the life force that underlies and drives Forgiveness. It is opposed by a conscious FearOfDeath that ones heart will burst. Underlying FearOf Death is the unconscious feelings of sin, guilt, and hatred. The unconscious love and desire for freedom driven by the life force underlying Forgiveness is made conscious slowly, knot by knot through prayer. Summarizing: Underlying Forgiveness is an uncon scious love of life in all of its wholeness, freedom, purity, and beauty. It's condition of satisfaction is the removal of the knots and the opening of the heart.
Set#6: The analysis of the Background Processor in set#6 is summarized in Tables III and IV. The background processor observes the mind from the background. We are not normally conscious of its operation. It is watching all foreground and background information, processing it, and putting it into LongTermMemory2. The background processor's activity becomes conscious after the "noisy" primary processor shuts down. This is seen clearly when one recalls the experience of mystical union. The background processor has been objectified and called various names by those who have experienced and recalled it: Nous, Purusha, Saksin, 'That part of the mind that is eternal', etc.

Summary of the Intentionality analysis:
When all knots have been removed, the system composed of the seven sets culminates in mystical union. Then ones unconscious unbounded love of life, ones unconscious desire for complete freedom, and ones natural TruenessOfMind all become realized, or fully conscious with intense cathexis. The fundamental note of ones existence is sounded: Love, Freedom, Rapture, and Truth. The background processor is observing the mind from the background during this culmination. It records all that it observes into long term memory where it can be recalled later.

Table II:

Tables III and IV:

E. Tentative Conclusions:

  1. The analysis links religion, cognitive neuroscience, and philosophy of the mind to form a new kind of psychoanalysis or religious meditation. It does this by recalling a deep religious experience from shallow unconscious and then organizing understanding, and integrating it by means of a cybernetics analysis.
  2. It introduces the cybernetic technique of Forrester-style system dynamics as a new analytical tool for cognitive scientists and psychiatrists.
  3. By including the computational mind (cognitive mechanism) and the phenomenological mind (embodied mind) in one model, a phenomenally conscious experience is able to be modeled and simulated for the first time. In addition it introduces meaning into cognitive science by indicating sources in the embodied mind that are driving the cognitive mechanism.
  4. It scientifically describes and clarifies the nature of the Dark Night of the Soul and mystical union using a mathematical model and computer simulation.
  5. Any model of the phenomenological mind can be used as a "test stand" for its accompanying model of the computational mind. In the case of the Dark Night, the present working model of the fast-acting cognitive mechanism could be removed from its slow-acting, phenomenological test stand and replaced by a more technically informed system dynamics model of the mechanism in follow-up work. This advanced model of the cognitive mechanism would be fine-tuned on the test stand to make its simulation match the experience.
  6. Background and foreground(primary) information are each processed in separate modules and in parallel in the cognitive mechanism.
  7. The paper indicates that the background processor concept is related to philosophical concepts of nous, 'that part of the mind that is eternal' (19), purusha, etc. These are projections of the background processor. When the term, soul, is used to indicate a watcher in the background, then it is also a projection of the background processor, although it is often used in other ways.
  8. The "flow state" is a state in which the focus of consciousness has switched over from the primary processor to the background processor. This occurs under certain circumstances when concentration or AttentionalFocus becomes too high (or retention time becomes too short), leading to information overload in the primary processor(18).
  9. Mystical union, samadhi, satori, wu-wei, fana, devekut, etc. are states in which concentration has increased beyond the concentration required for the flow state to a point where, in addition to shutting down the primary processor, significant portions of the nervous system have shut down, although the background processor continues to operate. This extreme state of concentration occurs when the heart is purified and fully open, allowing retention time to decrease to a point where it is equal to the period of the A-wave. This causes the A-wave to be quenched.
  10. Consciousness has two time states:
  11. Consciousness is a dynamic complex system. The multiple aspects of consciousness are described by the numerical values of each of the variables of the simulations of the model shown in Figures 1 and 2. This paper is an example of how consciousness can be clarified for the first time by a model.
  12. The use of Searle's theory of Intentionality to analyze the network of Intentionality unearthed by the system dynamics analysis reveals the following eidetic reduction: In mystical union ones unconscious unbounded love of life, ones unconscious desire for complete freedom, and ones natural trueness of mind all become realized, or fully conscious accompanied by intense cathexis. The fundamental note of ones existence and the Ground upon which to build a sound life are unveiled: Love, Freedom, Trueness, and Peace. This unconscious Intentional mental state is what is driving us all, including scientists and philosophers, to love, freedom, and trueness. Impurities or knots in the heart, however, pervert this unconscious drive or direction or force or motive.

F. References:

  1. Forrester, J.W. (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press; Forrester, J.W. (1980) Principles of systems. MIT Press; Richardson, G.P. (1991. Feedback thought in social science and system theory. Univ. of Penn Press; Richardson, G.P. and Pugh, A.L. III. (1981). Introduction to system dynamics modeling. MIT Press; Richmond, B., Peterson, S., and Vescuso, P. (1987) An academic user's guide to STELLA [software]. High Performance Systems, Inc., Lyme, NH; Wolpert, A. (1994). System dynamics for beginners. A. Wolpert, Publisher. Cambridge, MA.
  2. Wolpert, A. (1992). Application of system dynamics to the study of a religious experience. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Int. System Dynamics Conference, ed. J. A. M. Vennix. Utrecht Univ; Wolpert, A.(1995). A meditation on mystical union using system dynamics. Revised edition. A.Wolpert, Publisher. Cambridge, MA.
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. Harper & Row.
  4. Kakar, S. (1991). The analyst and the mystic. Univ of Chicago. pp 17-19.
  5. Simon, H. A. & Kaplan, C. A. (1993) Foundations of cognitive science. Ann.Review of Psychology 44:1-47.
  6. Kant, Critique of pure reason, B50.
  7. Edelman, G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire. Basic Books; Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. MIT Press.
  8. Matthew 5:8
  9. John of the Cross, Saint (1959). Dark night of the soul, translated and edited by E.A. Peers(from the 16th century manuscript #3446). Doubleday. Stanza 8.
  10. Searle, J. R. (1992).The rediscovery of the mind, MIT Press. p83.
  11. Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. Wiley. (See also Velmans, M. (1991). Is human information processing conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:651-726. [Also (1995) 18:702-703])
  12. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. Oxford. chapters 1 and 6.
  13. Schouten, J. F. & Bekker, J.A.M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica 27:143-153.
  14. Wickelgren, W. A. (1979). Cognitive psychology. Prentice-Hall. pp 270-271.
  15. Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
  16. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychological Review 63:81-97.
  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Motivation and creativity. New Ideas in Psychology 6(2): 159-176; Simon, H. A. (1988). Creativity and motivation: A response to Csikszentmihalyi. New Ideas in Psychology 6(2): 177-181.
  18. Miller, James G. (1978). Living systems. McGraw-Hill. pp 121-202.
  19. Spinoza, Ethics V, Propositions 21 and 23.
  20. Santayana, George. (1954). Life of reason. Scribner's. pp 11-12.

Appendix:

1) Tucson II corroboration of this paper's approach to consciousness:

2) Key idea: Forrester's 5th principle of system dynamics - 'Quantification of unmeasured but important concepts and relationships.'

Return to homepage.